On Jan 9, 2014, at 3:27 PM, Paul Hargrove <phhargr...@lbl.gov> wrote:
> I actually noted this in the unofficial tarball you rolled for me in December: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Paul Hargrove <phhargr...@lbl.gov> wrote: > [...] > I'm not sure why one is trying to build the usnic btl on Solaris at all. > Perhaps just because the OFED stack is present? > [...] > > I assumed your lack of response meant Cicso had some plans for Solaris > support that you could "neither confirm nor deny" ;) No -- just got lost in the SC/Thanksgiving/Christmas rush... :-( > Attached are the configure outputs and config.log from both the trunk and > 1.7-latest on a 64-bit Solaris-11 system. Thanks. We're just going to change the test in the usnic BTL to be explicit about only building on 64 bit Linux. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
