Ralph,

It took all night to run, but I CAN confirm "make check" passed on my
64-bit MIPS platform with last night's v1.7 tarball (1.7.4rc2r30361).

This was with "-mabi=64" in {C,CXX,FC}FLAGS and the corresponding wrapper
flags. I would guess from Brian's response to my failures reported for
PPC32 and MIPS32 that the other two ABIs won't work.  However, that won't
stop me from trying (for completeness).

-Paul


On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:

> I dug back and found that your trunk patch still applies, so I committed
> it and moved it to 1.7.4. So if you wouldn't mind verifying it once the
> nightly tarball is available, I'd appreciate it.
>
> Thanks!
> Ralph
>
> On Jan 20, 2014, at 9:38 PM, Paul Hargrove <phhargr...@lbl.gov> wrote:
>
> Building a recent (1.7.4rc2r30303) v1.7 tarball on a (QEMU-emulated)
> MIPS64 system I find that the opal atomics test fail.
>
> Applying the "for trunk" patch I attached to ticket #3039 roughly 1 year
> ago resolves the problems for me.  I suppose it would be great if at least
> one person with real MIPS h/w could verify.
>
> As far as I am concerned there is no "pressure" to push this into 1.7.4 if
> time is tight.  I am just (re)testing this platform and reporting the
> results for completeness.
>
> -Paul
>
> --
> Paul H. Hargrove                          phhargr...@lbl.gov
> Future Technologies Group
> Computer and Data Sciences Department     Tel: +1-510-495-2352
> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory     Fax: +1-510-486-6900
>  _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>



-- 
Paul H. Hargrove                          phhargr...@lbl.gov
Future Technologies Group
Computer and Data Sciences Department     Tel: +1-510-495-2352
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory     Fax: +1-510-486-6900

Reply via email to