On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com
> wrote:

> But just to confirm: you said that your pathscale compilers *do* compile
> 1.7.3 -- including the mpi_f08 module -- with no problems?  That would be a
> little surprising, because those same >=32 character symbol names are in
> 1.7.3...
>

Not quite - I was a bit too quick in composing that email.
The mpi_f08 stuff is NOT getting built in 1.7.3 when using pathf95.
What I should have said is "the fortran code and configure script in 1.7.3
work together to produce a failure-free build".

$ bin/ompi_info | grep -e Ident -e Fort
            Ident string: 1.7.3
             Fort mpif.h: yes (all)
            Fort use mpi: yes (full: ignore TKR)
       Fort use mpi size: deprecated-ompi-info-value
        Fort use mpi_f08: no
 Fort mpi_f08 compliance: The mpi_f08 module was not built
  Fort mpi_f08 subarrays: no
           Fort compiler: pathf95
       Fort compiler abs:
/project/projectdirs/ftg/ekopath-4.0.12.1/bin/pathf95
         Fort ignore TKR: yes (!DIR$ IGNORE_TKR)
   Fort 08 assumed shape: no
      Fort optional args: no
            Fort BIND(C): yes
            Fort PRIVATE: no
           Fort ABSTRACT: no
       Fort ASYNCHRONOUS: no
          Fort PROCEDURE: no
 Fort f08 using wrappers: yes
   Fort mpif.h profiling: yes
  Fort use mpi profiling: yes
   Fort use mpi_f08 prof: no

-Paul

-- 
Paul H. Hargrove                          phhargr...@lbl.gov
Future Technologies Group
Computer and Data Sciences Department     Tel: +1-510-495-2352
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory     Fax: +1-510-486-6900

Reply via email to