Rene,
The code reads
+ /* If ORTE was not setup yet, don't use orte_show_help */
+ if (orte_setup) {
+ orte_show_help("help-mpi-runtime",
+ "mpi_init:startup:internal-failure", true,
+ "MPI_INIT", "MPI_INIT", error, err_msg, ret);
+ } else {
+ opal_show_help("help-mpi-runtime",
+ "mpi_init:startup:internal-failure", true,
+ "MPI_INIT", "MPI_INIT", error, err_msg, ret);
+ }
The difference is indeed very subtle: in one case we call ORTE_show_help while
on the other we call OPAL_show_help. Exactly as the log message indicates.
George.
On Jan 31, 2014, at 15:49 , René Oertel <rene.oer...@cs.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote:
> Dear OpenMPI developers,
>
> I think the source code modification titled
> "Ensure that we don't try to call orte_show_help() before orte_init()
> succeeds." is buggy (see [1] at lines 755-763).
> There is no difference between the if and the else path of the code,
> i.e. checking orte_setup/rte_setup makes no sense.
> You will find the erroneous code below the 'error' label in
> ompi/runtime/ompi_mpi_init.c in SVN trunk, too.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> René
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi-svn-mirror/commit/b200ea0e1554d40ed4948f9823fc6dd7b0cc3ba6#diff-3673b21a7f42dc0665ea4470b3171df1
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
