On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:33 AM, George Bosilca <bosi...@icl.utk.edu> wrote:
> I’m concerned about your usage of abort here. Looking at the code I noticed > that you call RTE_ABORT deep inside the BTL stack. This is a significant > divergence from our current behavior (except for USNIC apparently as the code > is now in the 1.7). The BTLs are not deciders, but merely reporters. Any > error should be reported upstream, and will be dealt with at that level. The majority of places we call abort in this commit is actually down in a progress thread. We didn't think it was safe to call the PML error function in a progress thread -- is that incorrect? -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
