no problem - it's a minor cleanup.
Tetsuya > Hi Tetsuya > > Let me take a look when I get home this weekend - I'm giving an ORTE tutorial to a group of new developers this week and my time is very limited. > > Thanks > Ralph > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:37 PM, <tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp>wrote: > > Hi Ralph, I moved on to the development list. > > I'm not sure why add_one flag is used in the rr_byobj. > Here, if oversubscribed, proc is mapped to each object > one by one. So, I think the add_one is not necesarry. > > Instead, when the user doesn't permit oversubscription, > the second pass should be skipped. > > I made the logic a bit clear based upon this idea and > removed some outputs to synchronize it with the 1.7 branch. > > Please take a look at attached patch file. > > Tetsuya > > (See attached file: patch.byobj) > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > Link to this post: http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/03/14393.php_______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/develLink to this post: http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/03/14394.php
