This #ifndef sequence below the comment doesn't look right...
"if BLAH is NOT defined, undefine BLAH"  ????
That doesn't accomplish anything as far as I can tell.

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:17 AM, <svn-commit-mai...@open-mpi.org> wrote:

> Author: jsquyres (Jeff Squyres)
> Date: 2014-04-11 11:17:48 EDT (Fri, 11 Apr 2014)
> New Revision: 31369
> URL: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/31369
>
> Log:
> mpi.h.in: We're long past the v1.5 series; this comment can go away
>
> Text files modified:
>    trunk/ompi/include/mpi.h.in |     2 --
>    1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Modified: trunk/ompi/include/mpi.h.in
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- trunk/ompi/include/mpi.h.in Fri Apr 11 00:16:28 2014        (r31368)
> +++ trunk/ompi/include/mpi.h.in 2014-04-11 11:17:48 EDT (Fri, 11 Apr
> 2014)      (r31369)
> @@ -168,8 +168,6 @@
>  #undef OMPI_PARAM_CHECK
>
>  /* Enable warnings in wrong usage (e.g. deprecated) in user-level code */
> -/* XXX This __disabled__ by default for Open MPI-1.5, but will be
> __enabled__ for Open MPI-1.7 by default */
> -/* Users should be notified about this proposed change. */
>  #ifndef OMPI_WANT_MPI_INTERFACE_WARNING
>  #undef OMPI_WANT_MPI_INTERFACE_WARNING
>  #endif
> _______________________________________________
> svn-full mailing list
> svn-f...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/svn-full
>



-- 
Tim Mattox, Ph.D. - tmat...@gmail.com

Reply via email to