On Apr 24, 2014, at 1:38 AM, Mike Dubman <mi...@dev.mellanox.co.il> wrote:
> ** prefix each well-known MCA param with "print_": I like the overall idea of this RFC, but I'm not wild about this specific word "print" -- it seems weird. All the MCA parameters are *printed* -- the word "print" doesn't really distinguish anything here. (I know I'm just harping on a word, but I think it's an important word here... :-) ) Got a better suggestion, perchance? (I don't, offhand...) > ** Define two well-known mca parameters indicating external library runtime > and compiletime versions, i.e.: > > print_compiletime_version > print_runtime_version > > The following command will show all exposed well-known mca params from all > components: > ompi_info --parsable -l 9 |grep ":print_" How about changing this a bit (hoping my regexp syntax is correct at 6:30am before coffee...): ompi_info --all --parsable | egrep ':(compile|run)time_version' Then the "print_" prefix isn't needed. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
