I’m not sure how to interpret their claim. They say it has native support for 
little endian, fact that was true for quite some time 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerPC#Endian_modes). Unfortunately, I could not 
find any indication about the possible overhead of running little-endian 
applications on a big-endian OS.

  George.

 
On Apr 28, 2014, at 10:09 , Atchley, Scott <atchle...@ornl.gov> wrote:

> Hi George,
> 
> The Power8 can run in little-endian mode without penalty:
> 
> http://www.hpcwire.com/2014/04/23/power8-openpower-might-mean-hpc/
> 
> Not saying hetero support is unneeded, but this case may not be it.
> 
> Scott
> 
> On Apr 24, 2014, at 12:54 PM, George Bosilca <bosi...@icl.utk.edu> wrote:
> 
>> There seems to be an opportunity to still have heterogeneous environment in 
>> the future.
>> http://www.enterprisetech.com/2014/04/23/ibm-google-show-power8-systems-openpower-efforts/
>> 
>> I don’t think it is fair to shift the burden on the original developer 
>> instead of the committer who broke a feature. 
>> 
>> George.
>> 
>> On Apr 23, 2014, at 09:49 , Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> WHAT: Remove data-heterogeneous support from Open MPI
>>> 
>>> WHY: No one uses it (it's not the default), it's broken (probably has been 
>>> for a while)
>>> 
>>> WHERE: Datatype engine, some configury, and a few other places
>>> 
>>> TIMEOUT: Tuesday teleconf, 6 May 2014 (i.e., 2 weeks from now)
>>> 
>>> MORE DETAIL:
>>> 
>>> It recently came to my attention that we seem to have some bit rot in the 
>>> heterogeneous data representation support such that if you configure with 
>>> --enable-heterogeneous, even if you run on homogeneous machines, you can 
>>> get segv's with tcp,sm,self.
>>> 
>>> The heterogeneous support has never been enabled by default.  AFAIK, only 
>>> Cisco tests it regularly in its MTT.  I'm be greatly surprised if many 
>>> (any?) users use it at all.
>>> 
>>> So I have to ask myself: why do we keep this functionality around?  It 
>>> seems like we should delete this code, simplify things a little, and move 
>>> on.
>>> 
>>> Comments?
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Jeff Squyres
>>> jsquy...@cisco.com
>>> For corporate legal information go to: 
>>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>> Link to this post: 
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/04/14584.php
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> Link to this post: 
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/04/14594.php
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post: 
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/04/14627.php

Reply via email to