On 22/08/14 10:43, Ralph Castain wrote: > From your earlier concerns, I would have expected only to find 32 of > them running. Was that not the case in this run?
As I understand it in his original email he mentioned that with 1.6.5 all 48 processes were running at 100% CPU and was wondering if the buggy BIOS that caused hwloc the issues he reported on the hwloc-users list might be the cause for this regression in performance. All the best, Chris -- Christopher Samuel Senior Systems Administrator VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative Email: sam...@unimelb.edu.au Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545 http://www.vlsci.org.au/ http://twitter.com/vlsci
