Good points - I'd move it across then. If more people know about it, they might 
start using it again.


On Sep 17, 2014, at 7:57 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:

> On Sep 17, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
> 
>> Question: does it need to be private?
> 
> There are some grants under 2004/funding that probably might not be 
> appropriate to be public.  There might be a few other not-public things in 
> there, too.  I don't think I care enough to make a full/complete audit to be 
> able to be sure that everything non-public had been scrubbed (e.g., not 
> converted).
> 
>> Initially, we were using it to collaborate on papers prior to publication, 
>> but there are better ways to do that now. As it stands, I believe it is more 
>> of an archive.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
>> I occasionally troll it for material for presentations, though it is getting 
>> a little long in the tooth for anything useful.
> 
> I do find the "graphics" directory useful periodically.
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquy...@cisco.com
> For corporate legal information go to: 
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post: 
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/09/15858.php

Reply via email to