Hi Folks, I thought that 1.9.X release would at some point become the 2.0 release.
I thought trunk would go to 2.1 once we branch 1.9 from trunk, no? What Jeff and I don't like is using 1.9 with implicit 0, then having 1.9.1,1.9.2, etc. Howard -----Original Message----- From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 2:42 PM To: Open MPI Developers List Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: "v1.9.0" (vs. "v1.9") On Sep 22, 2014, at 2:39 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote: > Hmmm....I see your point, but that means "1.9.5" would actually be lagging > *behind* "1.9.0", which also seems confusing. Usually, if we release a 1.9.0, > we concurrently roll the trunk to 2.0 to avoid the confusion. Is that not > adequate? (...or probably 2.1 :-) ) -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel Link to this post: http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/09/15892.php
