Thanks Paul,
so the simplest way is to force -D_REENTRANT on Solaris, i will do that !
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2014/10/27 19:36, Paul Hargrove wrote:
> Gilles,
>
> I responded too quickly, not thinking that this test is pretty quick and
> doesn't require that I try sparc, ppc, ia64, etc.
> So my results:
>
> Solaris-{10,11}:
> With "cc" I agree with your findings (need -D_REENTRANT for correct
> behavior).
> With gcc either "-pthread" or "-D_REENTRANT" gave correct behavior
>
> NetBSD-5:
> Got "KO: error 4 (0)" no matter what I tried
>
> Linux, FreeBSD-{9,10}, NetBSD-6, OpenBSD-5:
> Using "-pthread" or "-lpthread" was necessary to link, and sufficient for
> correct results.
>
> MacOSX-10.{5,6,7,8}:
> No compiler options were required for 'cc' (which has been gcc, llvm-gcc
> and clang through those OS revs)
>
> Though I have access, I did not try compute nodes on BG/Q or Cray X{E,K,C}.
> Let me know if any of those are of significant concern.
>
> I no longer have AIX or IRIX access.
>
> -Paul
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet <
> gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Paul !
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>> On 2014/10/27 18:47, Paul Hargrove wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
>> <gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>
>> Paul, since you have access to many platforms, could you please run this
>> test with and without -D_REENTRANT / -D_THREAD_SAFE
>> and tell me where the program produces incorrect behaviour (output is
>> KO...) without the flag ?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>>
>> Gilles,
>>
>> I have a lot of things due between now and the SC14 conference.
>> I've added this test to my to-do list, but cannot be sure of how soon I'll
>> be able to get results back to you.
>>
>> Feel free to remind me off-list,
>> -Paul
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing listde...@open-mpi.org
>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> Link to this post:
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/10/16095.php
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> Link to this post:
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/10/16096.php
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/10/16097.php
