I just updated the wiki:

NOTE: Pull requests on ompi-release must include a hash reference in the 
body/comments corresponding to the commit(s) on ompi:master from which it is 
derived, OR indicate that this is solely a release branch bug (i.e., there's no 
corresponding commit on ompi:master because the bug doesn't/didn't exist on 
ompi:master).




On Oct 27, 2014, at 9:57 PM, Ralph Castain 
<r...@open-mpi.org<mailto:r...@open-mpi.org>> wrote:

Just create a topic branch from v1.8 in a local clone of ompi-release, make the 
change there, and then file a PR on the ompi-release repo

Obviously, if it is a bug solely confined to v1.8, you can’t put it in master 
first :-)


On Oct 27, 2014, at 3:22 PM, Howard Pritchard 
<hpprit...@gmail.com<mailto:hpprit...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Folks,

A cut and past error seems to have happened with
plm_alps_modules.c in 1.8 which causes a compile failure
when building for cray.  So right now, there's no building
ompi 1.8 for crays.

The problem is not present in master.

For these kinds of problems, are we suppose to bypass
all the "has to be in master, need commit, etc." stuff described in

https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/wiki/SubmittingPullRequests

and just go straight to pushing to a fork of ompi-release, etc.
as per the rest of the instructions on submitting pull requests?

Just want to make sure I'm doing the right thing here.

Howard



_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
Link to this post: 
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/10/16104.php

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org<mailto:de...@open-mpi.org>
Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
Link to this post: 
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/10/16105.php


--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com<mailto:jsquy...@cisco.com>
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

Reply via email to