w00t. Now we just need to focus on https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/issues/258 to fix the issue properly...
On Nov 3, 2014, at 2:08 PM, Friedley, Andrew <andrew.fried...@intel.com> wrote: > Thanks, we verified here this regression is fixed and it also appears that a > regression we saw between 1.8.1 and 1.8.3 (but had not yet pinned down) is > fixed too. Performance results from the nightly are matching our old v1.6 > numbers. > > Andrew > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Jeff >> Squyres (jsquyres) >> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 7:49 AM >> To: Open MPI Developers List >> Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] enable-smp-locks affects PSM performance >> >> On Nov 3, 2014, at 10:31 AM, Friedley, Andrew <andrew.fried...@intel.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Jeff, we're working to verify. I don't mind the slower behavior on >> the trunk; we are only concerned with the stable release series. Enabling >> thread safety options on the trunk/master is no problem here. >>> >>> Did the 'more expensive freelists' change make it to the release series as >> well? >> >> Yes. And all of that should now be reverted. >> >> -- >> Jeff Squyres >> jsquy...@cisco.com >> For corporate legal information go to: >> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> de...@open-mpi.org >> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >> Link to this post: http://www.open- >> mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/11/16145.php > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > Link to this post: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/11/16154.php -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
