On Nov 6, 2014, at 6:21 PM, Ralph Castain <rhc.open...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree - I sent the note because I see people doing things a bit differently > than expected. I have no issue with PRs for things where people want extra > eyes on something before committing, or as part of an RFC. Just want to > ensure folks aren’t letting them languish expecting some kind of gatekeeper > to merge them…as that will never happen. +1 The wiki actually specifically mentions this use case (PR's against master for RFCs and extra eyes). But it would be good to clarify that there is no gatekeeper for these PRs like there is in ompi-release. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
