rhel6.4
we can provide ssh access to interested parties.

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet <
gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Mike,
>
> BTW what is the distro running on your test cluster ?
>
> Mike Dubman <mi...@dev.mellanox.co.il> wrote:
> ok, I disabled vader tests in SHMEM and it passes.
> it can be requested from jenkins by specifying "vader" in PR comment line.
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet <
> gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
>
>>  Mike,
>>
>> that will remove the false positive, but also remove an important piece
>> of information :
>> there is something wrong with the master.
>>
>> would you mind discussion this on the weekly call ?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>>
>> On 2014/11/11 17:38, Mike Dubman wrote:
>>
>> how about if I will disable the failing test(s) and make jenkins to pass?
>> It will help us to make sure we don`t break something that did work before?
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet 
>> <gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>  Mike,
>>
>> Jenkins runs automated tests on each pull request, and i think this is a
>> good thing.
>>
>> recently, it reported a bunch of failure but i could not find anything
>> to blame in the PR itself.
>>
>> so i created a dummy PR https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/264 with
>> git commit --allow-empty
>> and waited for Jenkins to do its job.
>>
>> the test failed, which means there is an issue in the master.
>> from the master point of view, it is good to know there is an issue.
>> from the PR point of view, this is a false positive since the PR does
>> nothing wrong.
>>
>> i was unable to find anything on github that indicates the master does
>> not pass the automated tests.
>> is such automated test running vs the master ? if yes, where can we find
>> the results ?
>> in order to avoid dealing with false positive, is there any possibility
>> to disable automated tests on the PR
>> if the master does not pass the tests ?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Gilles
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing listde...@open-mpi.org
>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> Link to this 
>> post:http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/11/16283.php
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing listde...@open-mpi.org
>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>
>> Link to this post: 
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/11/16284.php
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> Link to this post:
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/11/16285.php
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> M.
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/11/16287.php
>



-- 

Kind Regards,

M.

Reply via email to