rhel6.4 we can provide ssh access to interested parties. On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet < gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Mike, > > BTW what is the distro running on your test cluster ? > > Mike Dubman <mi...@dev.mellanox.co.il> wrote: > ok, I disabled vader tests in SHMEM and it passes. > it can be requested from jenkins by specifying "vader" in PR comment line. > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet < > gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote: > >> Mike, >> >> that will remove the false positive, but also remove an important piece >> of information : >> there is something wrong with the master. >> >> would you mind discussion this on the weekly call ? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Gilles >> >> >> On 2014/11/11 17:38, Mike Dubman wrote: >> >> how about if I will disable the failing test(s) and make jenkins to pass? >> It will help us to make sure we don`t break something that did work before? >> >> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet >> <gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote: >> >> >> Mike, >> >> Jenkins runs automated tests on each pull request, and i think this is a >> good thing. >> >> recently, it reported a bunch of failure but i could not find anything >> to blame in the PR itself. >> >> so i created a dummy PR https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/264 with >> git commit --allow-empty >> and waited for Jenkins to do its job. >> >> the test failed, which means there is an issue in the master. >> from the master point of view, it is good to know there is an issue. >> from the PR point of view, this is a false positive since the PR does >> nothing wrong. >> >> i was unable to find anything on github that indicates the master does >> not pass the automated tests. >> is such automated test running vs the master ? if yes, where can we find >> the results ? >> in order to avoid dealing with false positive, is there any possibility >> to disable automated tests on the PR >> if the master does not pass the tests ? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Gilles >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing listde...@open-mpi.org >> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >> Link to this >> post:http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/11/16283.php >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing listde...@open-mpi.org >> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >> >> Link to this post: >> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/11/16284.php >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> de...@open-mpi.org >> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >> Link to this post: >> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/11/16285.php >> > > > > -- > > Kind Regards, > > M. > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > Link to this post: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/11/16287.php > -- Kind Regards, M.