My enthusiasm for this was primarily because I thought we had talked about 
exactly this issue before (at the last meeting in Chicago?), and decided that 
the option is useless -- in part, because it always *must* be enabled for 
shared memory correctness.

Is that incorrect?


On Jan 6, 2015, at 4:12 PM, George Bosilca <bosi...@icl.utk.edu> wrote:

> Successive alteration of the build system made this option less relevant and 
> especially less meaningful. However, while removing it sounds like a 
> desirable cleanup, we have to keep in mind that this will enable all locks 
> and all memory barriers even in cases where they are not necessary (via 
> OPAL_WANT_SMP_LOCKS).
> 
> Thus, I do not share the enthusiasm of the others. I would prefer to see an 
> evaluation of the impact on performance, a patch and a little bit more than 
> 1/2 a day to react to it (the proposed deadline seems to be today January 
> 6th) before such a drastic change.
> 
>   George.
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
> +1
> 
> > On Jan 6, 2015, at 9:04 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com> 
> > wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Jan 6, 2015, at 11:55 AM, Howard Pritchard <hpprit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I agree.  Please remove this config option.
> >>
> >> 2015-01-06 9:44 GMT-07:00 Nathan Hjelm <hje...@lanl.gov>:
> >>
> >> What: Remove the --disable-smp-locks configure option from master.
> >>
> >> Why: Use of this option produces incorrect results/undefined behavior
> >> when any shared memory BTL is in use. Since BTL usage is enabled even
> >> when using cm for point-to-point this option can never be safely used.
> >>
> >> When: Thurs, Jan 6, 2015
> >>
> >> -Nathan
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> devel mailing list
> >> de...@open-mpi.org
> >> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> >> Link to this post: 
> >> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/01/16736.php
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> devel mailing list
> >> de...@open-mpi.org
> >> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> >> Link to this post: 
> >> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/01/16737.php
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jeff Squyres
> > jsquy...@cisco.com
> > For corporate legal information go to: 
> > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > de...@open-mpi.org
> > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> > Link to this post: 
> > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/01/16739.php
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post: 
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/01/16740.php
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post: 
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/01/16741.php


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

Reply via email to