Hi,

Sure:
https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi-release/issues/178

Thanks,
Alina.

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com
> wrote:

> Alina --
>
> Sorry; I think this bug report got lost in the run-up to the Open MPI dev
> meeting last week, and that fact that Nathan (the primary one-sided
> maintainer) is taking a little time off.
>
> Can you file a Github issue about this?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> > On Jan 19, 2015, at 4:50 AM, Alina Sklarevich <ali...@dev.mellanox.co.il>
> wrote:
> >
> > Attaching the test for reproduction.
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Alina Sklarevich <
> ali...@dev.mellanox.co.il> wrote:
> > Dear OMPI community,
> >
> >
> > We observe a segmentation fault in our regression testing. Our initial
> investigation shows that It happens for any 1.8.x release and with any
> PML/BTL/MTL combo on two processes, when running the MPICH one-sided test,
> accumulate-fence test, attached to this report with the following command
> line:
> >
> >
> > $mpirun -np 2 --bind-to core --display-map --map-by node -mca pml ob1
> -mca btl self,openib ../test/mpi/rma/accfence1
> >
> >
> > The initial trace is:
> >
> >
> > Data for JOB [16088,1] offset 0
> >
> >
> > ========================   JOB MAP   ========================
> >
> >
> > Data for node: vegas15 Num slots: 16     Max slots: 0        Num procs: 1
> >
> >                Process OMPI jobid: [16088,1] App: 0 Process rank: 0
> >
> >
> > Data for node: vegas16 Num slots: 16     Max slots: 0        Num procs: 1
> >
> >                Process OMPI jobid: [16088,1] App: 0 Process rank: 1
> >
> >
> > =============================================================
> >
> > [vegas16:22098] *** Process received signal ***
> >
> > [vegas16:22098] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
> >
> > [vegas16:22098] Signal code: Address not mapped (1)
> >
> > [vegas16:22098] Failing at address: 0x34
> >
> > [vegas16:22098] [ 0] /lib64/libpthread.so.0[0x3f6e80f710]
> >
> > [vegas16:22098] [ 1]
> /labhome/alinas/workspace/ompi/openmpi-1.8.4/install/lib/libopen-pal.so.6(opal_memory_ptmalloc2_int_free+0x188)[0x7ffff772baa2]
> >
> > [vegas16:22098] [ 2]
> /labhome/alinas/workspace/ompi/openmpi-1.8.4/install/lib/libopen-pal.so.6(opal_memory_ptmalloc2_free+0x98)[0x7ffff772a1f5]
> >
> > [vegas16:22098] [ 3]
> /labhome/alinas/workspace/ompi/openmpi-1.8.4/install/lib/libopen-pal.so.6(+0xd6f59)[0x7ffff7728f59]
> >
> > [vegas16:22098] [ 4]
> /labhome/alinas/workspace/ompi/openmpi-1.8.4/install/lib/libmpi.so.1(+0x2f884)[0x7ffff7c92884]
> >
> > [vegas16:22098] [ 5]
> /labhome/alinas/workspace/ompi/openmpi-1.8.4/install/lib/libmpi.so.1(ompi_attr_delete_all+0x2eb)[0x7ffff7c92dbe]
> >
> > [vegas16:22098] [ 6]
> /labhome/alinas/workspace/ompi/openmpi-1.8.4/install/lib/libmpi.so.1(ompi_comm_free+0x6a)[0x7ffff7c99336]
> >
> > [vegas16:22098] [ 7]
> /labhome/alinas/workspace/ompi/openmpi-1.8.4/install/lib/openmpi/mca_osc_rdma.so(ompi_osc_rdma_free+0x921)[0x7ffff32ab3bc]
> >
> > [vegas16:22098] [ 8]
> /labhome/alinas/workspace/ompi/openmpi-1.8.4/install/lib/libmpi.so.1(ompi_win_free+0x24)[0x7ffff7cc0c87]
> >
> > [vegas16:22098] [ 9]
> /labhome/alinas/workspace/ompi/openmpi-1.8.4/install/lib/libmpi.so.1(MPI_Win_free+0xb8)[0x7ffff7d2b702]
> >
> > [vegas16:22098] [10]
> /labhome/alinas/workspace/mpich/mpich-mellanox/test/mpi/rma/accfence1[0x402447]
> >
> > [vegas16:22098] [11]
> /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd)[0x3f6e41ed1d]
> >
> > [vegas16:22098] [12]
> /labhome/alinas/workspace/mpich/mpich-mellanox/test/mpi/rma/accfence1[0x402119]
> >
> > [vegas16:22098] *** End of error message ***
> >
> >
> >
> > And subsequent investigation of the core file generates the following
> hints:
> >
> >
> > (gdb) bt
> >
> > #0  0x00007ffff7722a96 in opal_memory_ptmalloc2_int_free
> (av=0x7ffff796b320, mem=0x7125a0) at malloc.c:4402
> >
> > #1  0x00007ffff77211f5 in opal_memory_ptmalloc2_free (mem=0x7125a0) at
> malloc.c:3511
> >
> > #2  0x00007ffff771ff59 in opal_memory_linux_free_hook (__ptr=0x7125a0,
> caller=0x7ffff769a8f6) at hooks.c:709
> >
> > #3  0x00007ffff769a8f6 in opal_datatype_destruct (datatype=0x7123b0) at
> opal_datatype_create.c:59
> >
> > #4  0x00007ffff3346ad0 in opal_obj_run_destructors (object=0x7123b0) at
> ../../../../opal/class/opal_object.h:448
> >
> > #5  0x00007ffff334af68 in process_acc (module=0x70e370, source=0,
> acc_header=0x70fef0) at osc_rdma_data_move.c:1184
> >
> > #6  0x00007ffff334c752 in process_frag (module=0x70e370, frag=0x70fee0)
> at osc_rdma_data_move.c:1576
> >
> > #7  0x00007ffff334cafb in ompi_osc_rdma_callback (request=0x700b80) at
> osc_rdma_data_move.c:1656
> >
> > #8  0x00007ffff3db3770 in ompi_request_complete (request=0x700b80,
> with_signal=true) at ../../../../ompi/request/request.h:402
> >
> > #9  0x00007ffff3db3f11 in recv_request_pml_complete (recvreq=0x700b80)
> at pml_ob1_recvreq.h:181
> >
> > #10 0x00007ffff3db5019 in mca_pml_ob1_recv_frag_callback_match
> (btl=0x7ffff41d9c20, tag=65 'A', des=0x7fffffffd210, cbdata=0x0) at
> pml_ob1_recvfrag.c:243
> >
> > #11 0x00007ffff3fd6c4b in mca_btl_sm_component_progress () at
> btl_sm_component.c:1087
> >
> > #12 0x00007ffff7678d66 in opal_progress () at runtime/opal_progress.c:187
> >
> > #13 0x00007ffff3dabb44 in opal_condition_wait (c=0x7ffff7ffa120,
> m=0x7ffff7ffa160) at ../../../../opal/threads/condition.h:78
> >
> > #14 0x00007ffff3dabcc6 in ompi_request_wait_completion
> (req=0x7fffffffd410) at ../../../../ompi/request/request.h:381
> >
> > #15 0x00007ffff3dac9da in mca_pml_ob1_recv (addr=0x7fffffffd9ec,
> count=1, datatype=0x7ffff7fe25c0, src=0, tag=-24, comm=0x70dac0,
> status=0x0) at pml_ob1_irecv.c:109
> >
> > #16 0x00007ffff2cd2868 in ompi_coll_tuned_scatter_intra_basic_linear
> (sbuf=0x0, scount=1, sdtype=0x7ffff7fe25c0, rbuf=0x7fffffffd9ec, rcount=1,
> rdtype=0x7ffff7fe25c0, root=0, comm=0x70dac0, module=0x70fa20)
> >
> >     at coll_tuned_scatter.c:231
> >
> > #17 0x00007ffff2cbbd75 in ompi_coll_tuned_scatter_intra_dec_fixed
> (sbuf=0x0, scount=1, sdtype=0x7ffff7fe25c0, rbuf=0x7fffffffd9ec, rcount=1,
> rdtype=0x7ffff7fe25c0, root=0, comm=0x70dac0, module=0x70fa20)
> >
> >     at coll_tuned_decision_fixed.c:769
> >
> > #18 0x00007ffff3b9c16e in mca_coll_basic_reduce_scatter_block_intra
> (sbuf=0x70e220, rbuf=0x7fffffffd9ec, rcount=1, dtype=0x7ffff7fe25c0,
> op=0x60d180, comm=0x70dac0, module=0x70f230)
> >
> >     at coll_basic_reduce_scatter_block.c:102
> >
> > #19 0x00007ffff334eecc in ompi_osc_rdma_fence (assert=0, win=0x70e260)
> at osc_rdma_active_target.c:140
> >
> > #20 0x00007ffff7d2a1b5 in PMPI_Win_fence (assert=0, win=0x70e260) at
> pwin_fence.c:59
> >
> > #21 0x0000000000402405 in main ()
> >
> >
> >
> > It looks to be a clear case of memory corruption hidden somewhere in the
> OSC code. Nathan, can you please have a look?
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Alina.
> >
> >
> > <accfence1.c>_______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > de...@open-mpi.org
> > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> > Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/01/16803.php
>
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquy...@cisco.com
> For corporate legal information go to:
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/01/16867.php
>

Reply via email to