So far as I can tell, it is complaining about the definitions - the error doesn’t indicate anyone is using it
> On Feb 26, 2015, at 8:07 AM, Nathan Hjelm <hje...@lanl.gov> wrote: > > > Is it just complaining that the inline functions are deprecated or some > code still using ompi_free_list_t? If it is the former I will go ahead > and remove the dummy implementation. > > -Nathan > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 09:00:26PM -0800, Ralph Castain wrote: >> It looks like everything in ompi_free_list has been tied together and >> labeled as deprecated. So I'm getting this warning: >> In file included from class/ompi_free_list.c:12:0: >> ../opal/class/ompi_free_list.h: In function 'ompi_free_list_init_ex': >> ../opal/class/ompi_free_list.h:100:5: warning: >> 'ompi_free_list_init_ex_new' is deprecated (declared at >> ../opal/class/ompi_free_list.h:61) [-Wdeprecated-declarations] >> return ompi_free_list_init_ex_new (free_list, element_size, >> alignment, >> ^ >> Can someone please clean this up? It's causing Intel unit tests to abort >> as they treat warnings as errors. >> Thanks >> Ralph > >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> de...@open-mpi.org >> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >> Link to this post: >> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/02/17052.php > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > Link to this post: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/02/17055.php
