> On Aug 26, 2015, at 8:23 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com> > wrote: > > On Aug 26, 2015, at 11:17 AM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote: >> >> Meantime, the proposed workaround to use the MCA param to ignore PSM should >> work. > > ...but only when the PSM MTL is not compiled directly into libmpi, e.g., via > using --disable-dlopen, or --enable-static (neither of which are the default, > but it's worth mentioning).
Is that true? If the problem lies in not “nicely” handling the errhandler registrations, then so long as PSM is not selected, it shouldn’t have an impact. > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquy...@cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > Link to this post: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/08/17870.php
