Understood - for now, it appears RH has an acceptable solution by using the MCA param, so I see no need for further action until you complete the fix
> On Sep 4, 2015, at 7:45 AM, Friedley, Andrew <andrew.fried...@intel.com> > wrote: > > The PSM2 MTL code I submitted to master, 1.10, and 2.x will auto-build if the > library is detected in the system; I don't think that's been changed since. > Feel free to disable the auto-build until we can get a PSM2 solution, but > we'd much prefer not to outright remove the PSM2 MTL. > > Andrew > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Ralph >> Castain >> Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2015 4:44 PM >> To: Open MPI Developers >> Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] 1.10.0 issue >> >> Yes, it actually is rather easy to do. I can check, but I think that should >> happen >> now (unless psm2 was set to auto-build if the lib was detected). Regardless, >> we can always have RH et al simply build with —enable-mca-no-build=mtl- >> psm2 and that will solve the problem. >> >> Please keep us posted - and thanks! >> Ralph >> >>> On Sep 3, 2015, at 3:44 PM, Friedley, Andrew <andrew.fried...@intel.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Ralph & crew, >>> >>> I'm representing the Intel PSM team to Open MPI. They're aware of the >> problem and have seen the comments on both this thread and in OFI, and >> are working on solving the issue within PSM2. Current estimate is that it >> will >> take 3-4 weeks. >>> >>> If it comes to removing the PSM2 MTL from 1.10, would it instead be >> possible to disable it from being configured/built by default, unless >> specifically requested using --with-psm2? >>> >>> Andrew >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Ralph >>>> Castain >>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 6:22 PM >>>> To: Open MPI Developers >>>> Subject: [OMPI devel] 1.10.0 issue >>>> >>>> Hi folks >>>> >>>> I regret to say that 1.10.0 is hitting an issue with at least one upstream >> distro. >>>> Apparently, there is a symbol conflict between the PSM and PSM2 >>>> libraries that precludes building both of those MTLs at the same >>>> time. This is leading the distro to push for release of two OMPI >>>> 1.10.0 builds - one with PSM and the other with PSM2. >>>> >>>> IMO, this is a very undesirable situation. I agree with the distro >>>> that delaying release for some significant time as this would impact >> everyone else’s users. >>>> Therefore, assuming that the PSM team is unable to quickly resolve >>>> the problem in their libraries, my inclination is to release an >>>> immediate 1.10.1 with the PSM2 MTL removed. >>>> >>>> I’m soliciting input - any opinions? >>>> Ralph >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> devel mailing list >>>> de...@open-mpi.org >>>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >>>> Link to this post: http://www.open- >>>> mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/09/17919.php >>> _______________________________________________ >>> devel mailing list >>> de...@open-mpi.org >>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >>> Link to this post: >>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/09/17953.php >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> de...@open-mpi.org >> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >> Link to this post: http://www.open- >> mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/09/17956.php > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > Link to this post: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/09/17971.php
