These mailing lists are public, and their archives can be found online. While I do appreciate the fact that they asked, I don't see how we can prevent the KState researchers from using them.
George. On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Howard Pritchard <hpprit...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm okay with it as long as they use an MPI based mapreduce to do the > analytics. > > Howard > > > 2015-10-02 9:32 GMT-06:00 Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com>: > >> I've received a request from a researcher at Kansas State University to >> get a copy of all old us...@open-mpi.org and de...@open-mpi.org emails. >> In their words: >> >> Jeff: >> >> One of our new professors at K-State is interested in analyzing the >> dev and user archives for OpenMPI to get a statistical >> characterization >> of the types of bugs/issues that are encountered. Is there an easy >> way to >> get a tarball of each for the past year or so to start? >> >> We do actually have the entire records of all users@ and devel@ mails in >> mbox format at IU. >> >> Does anyone have any opinions about us giving copies of these mbox files >> to this KState researcher? >> >> -- >> Jeff Squyres >> jsquy...@cisco.com >> For corporate legal information go to: >> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> de...@open-mpi.org >> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >> Link to this post: >> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/10/18120.php >> > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > Link to this post: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/10/18121.php >
