Thanks for the reply Ralph. Best wishes for your surgery and recuperation.

Regards
--Nysal

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:

> You hit upon a problem that Jeff and I were talking about yesterday. Both
> master and 2.x need to be fixed. The problem is a little more subtle as
> direct launch under non-PMIx systems doesn’t have access to a non-blocking
> fence, and thus there is no way to call progress while waiting for the
> barrier to complete. I’ve proposed a solution, but I’m out for a day or two
> (eye surgery this morning) and won’t get a chance to fix it right away.
>
>
> > On Oct 6, 2015, at 11:17 AM, Nysal Jan K A <jny...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > In v1.8 there is a RTE barrier in finalize.
> OMPI_LAZY_WAIT_FOR_COMPLETION waits for the barrier to complete. Internally
> opal_progress() is invoked. In the master branch we call PMIX fence
> instead. PMIX_WAIT_FOR_COMPLETION seems to only call usleep. How will ompi
> progress outstanding operations ?
> >
> > Regards
> > --Nysal
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > de...@open-mpi.org
> > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> > Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/10/18144.php
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/10/18145.php

Reply via email to