+1, with an addition and modification:

* add the async_modex on by default
* make the change in master and let it "stew" for awhile before moving to
2.0. I believe only Cisco has been running MTT against that setup so far.


On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet <
gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> should we also enable sparse groups by default ?
> (or at least on master, and then v2.x later)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Gilles
>
>
> On Thursday, February 4, 2016, Joshua Ladd <jladd.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <
>> jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>> WHAT: Decrease default value of mpi_add_procs_cutoff from 1024 to 32
>>>
>>> WHY: The "partial add procs" behavior is supposed to be a key feature of
>>> v2.0.0
>>>
>>> WHERE: ompi/mpi/runtime/ompi_mpi_params.c
>>>
>>> TIMEOUT: Next Tuesday teleconf (9 Feb 2016)
>>>
>>> MORE DETAIL:
>>>
>>> The mpi_add_procs_cutoff MCA param controls the crossover to when we
>>> start doing "partial" add_procs() behavior (i.e., don't just
>>> pml.add_procs(ALL_PROCS) during MPI_INIT).  Currently, this value defaults
>>> to 1024, meaning that we don't get the "partial add_procs" behavior until
>>> you run 1025 processes.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have an issue with reducing this value to a lower value?  I
>>> picked 32 somewhat arbitrarily.  See the PR for master:
>>>
>>>     https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/1340
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jeff Squyres
>>> jsquy...@cisco.com
>>> For corporate legal information go to:
>>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>> Link to this post:
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/02/18543.php
>>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/02/18551.php
>

Reply via email to