Ralph,

that means that when a developer truse to reproduce exactly what an end
user did, he/she will get a different behavior because only one of them is
known. imho, that sounds a bit too crazy.

what about an other approach :
have mpirun --version (and MPI api if any) clearly state this is a debug
build ?
I mean a "serious" benchmark should list the third party libs and their
versions, so that could be enough.

Cheers,

Gilles

On Wednesday, March 2, 2016, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:

> What about this crazy idea? We already have .opal_unignore that looks at
> the username. Well, what if we did the same thing here? Have autogen.pl
> look at the username - if it is a known developer, then enable debug. If
> not, then disable it.
>
> I am just concerned that we are going to spend a bunch of time responding
> to annoyed/concerned users about this warning. Every time we ask someone to
> run a debug build to diagnose a problem, or someone builds a debug build
> for their own diagnostic purposes, they are going to get an unnecessary
> warning. We already have had to contend with the annoyed users dealing with
> auto-binding because we are trying to respond to the benchmarkers who
> refuse to make an effort to compare apples to apples - I would advise
> against extending that practice.
>
> I personally don’t mind having to explicitly enable-debug as I build from
> a platform file, but making it more convenient for those developers who
> don’t would be nice.
>
> > On Mar 2, 2016, at 4:51 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 2, 2016, at 6:30 AM, Mark Santcroos <mark.santcr...@rutgers.edu
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 02 Mar 2016, at 5:06 , Gilles Gouaillardet <gil...@rist.or.jp
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>> what about *not* issuing this warning if OpenMPI is built from git ?
> >>> that would be friendlier for OMPI developers,
> >>> and should basically *not* affect endusers, since they would rather
> build OMPI from a tarball.
> >>
> >> VPATH builds aren't debug builds by default, or are they?
> >
> > Correct -- VPATH builds are *not* debug-by-default builds.
> >
> > Just to be clear: the debug-by-default builds are activated when a .git
> directory is seen in the build directory.  This is for people who git clone
> and do a non-VPATH build.  Such people are typically developers.
> >
> > And just to make *that* more clear: building from a tarball will not
> have a .git directory, so you get an optimized build by default.
> >
> > --
> > Jeff Squyres
> > jsquy...@cisco.com <javascript:;>
> > For corporate legal information go to:
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > de...@open-mpi.org <javascript:;>
> > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> > Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/03/18664.php
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org <javascript:;>
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/03/18665.php

Reply via email to