Didn’t OSHMEM up-level its API?

I believe we also have some early support in there for DVM and Singularity, but 
not the full-blown capability that is in master. Unsure if we want to advertise 
that for 2.0, maybe wait for the updates in 2.1?


> On Apr 29, 2016, at 10:55 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> I'm thinking something like a simple "User's migration guide: 1.8.x/1.10.x 
> --> 2.0.0"
> 
> Here's big topics I see so far:
> 
> User-Noticeable changes
> (i.e., things that may prevent users from simply re-compiling / re-mpirun'ing 
> their existing MPI app)
> -----------------------
> - mpirun -np behavior
> - OMPIO is now the default (not ROMIO)
> - ...more?
> 
> New features
> ------------
> - Launch scalability improvements (i.e., support for PMIx)
> - Lots of improvements to MPI RMA
> - Improved support for MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE
> - ompi_info pretty print improvements
> - UCX support
> - PLFS support (via OMPIO)
> - Better Cray build / SLURM support
> - ...more?
> 
> Removed support
> ---------------
> - OS X Leopard
> - Cray XT
> - VampirTrace
> - Myrinet MX / OpenMX
> - coll:ml module
> - Alpha processors
> - --enable-mpi-profiling option
> - Checkpoint / restart
> - ...more?
> 
> 
>> On Apr 29, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Howard Pritchard <hpprit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Jeff,
>> 
>> checkpoint/restart is not supported in this release.
>> 
>> Does this release work with totalview?  I recall we had some problems,
>> and do not remember if they were resolved.
>> 
>> We may also want to clarify if any PML/MTLs are experimental in this
>> release.
>> 
>> MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE support.
>> 
>> 
>> Howard
>> 
>> 
>> 2016-04-29 10:34 GMT-06:00 Cabral, Matias A <matias.a.cab...@intel.com>:
>> How about for “developers that have not been following the transition from 
>> 1.x to 2.0?  Particularly myself J. I started contributing to some specific 
>> parts (psm2 mtl) and following changes. However, I don’t have details of 
>> what is changing in 2.0. I see there could be different level of details in 
>> the “developer’s transition guide book”, ranging from architectural change 
>> to what pieces were moved where.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _MAC
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Joshua Ladd
>> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 7:11 AM
>> To: Open MPI Developers <de...@open-mpi.org>
>> Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] 2.0.0 is coming: what do we need to communicate to 
>> users?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Certainly we need to communicate / advertise / evangelize the improvements 
>> in job launch - the largest and most substantial change between the two 
>> branches - and provide some best practice guidelines for usage (use direct 
>> modex for applications with sparse communication patterns and full modex for 
>> dense.) I would be happy to contribute some paragraphs. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Obviously, we also need to communicate, reiterate the need to recompile 
>> codes built against the 1.10 series.  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Best, 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Josh
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thursday, April 28, 2016, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> We're getting darn close to v2.0.0.
>> 
>> What "gotchas" do we need to communicate to users?  I.e., what will people 
>> upgrading from v1.8.x/v1.10.x be surprised by?
>> 
>> The most obvious one I can think of is mpirun requiring -np when slots are 
>> not specified somehow.
>> 
>> What else do we need to communicate?  It would be nice to avoid the 
>> confusion users experienced regarding affinity functionality/options when 
>> upgrading from v1.6 -> v1.8 (because we didn't communicate these changes 
>> well, IMHO).
>> 
>> --
>> Jeff Squyres
>> jsquy...@cisco.com
>> For corporate legal information go to: 
>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> Link to this post: 
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/04/18832.php
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> Link to this post: 
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/04/18843.php
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> Link to this post: 
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/04/18844.php
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquy...@cisco.com
> For corporate legal information go to: 
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post: 
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/04/18846.php

Reply via email to