Kewl - thanks! I will take care of this, but to me the most pressing issue is 
why this event notification is being generated at all. It shouldn’t be.

> On Jul 16, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet 
> <gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I finally got it :-)
> 
> in send_notification() from orted_submit.c, info is 
> OPAL_PMIX_EVENT_NON_DEFAULT, but in pmix2x.c and pmix_ext20.c, 
> PMIX_EVENT_NON_DEFAULT is tested.
> If I use OPAL_PMIX_EVENT_NON_DEFAULT in pmix*, that fixes the issue
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gilles
> 
> On Sunday, July 17, 2016, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org 
> <mailto:r...@open-mpi.org>> wrote:
> Okay, I’ll investigate why that is happening - thanks!
> 
>> On Jul 16, 2016, at 7:45 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet 
>> <gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com 
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>> 
>> The parent job (e.g.  the task that calls MPI_Comm_spawn) receives it.
>> I cannot tell whether the child (e.g. the spawned task) receives it too or 
>> not
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Gilles
>> 
>> On Saturday, July 16, 2016, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org 
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','r...@open-mpi.org');>> wrote:
>> I can fix the initialization. What puzzles me is that no debugger_release 
>> message should be sent unless a debugger is attached - in which case, the 
>> event should be registered.
>> 
>> So why is it being sent? Is it the child job that is receiving it? Or is it 
>> the parent?
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 16, 2016, at 7:19 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet 
>>> <gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com <>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I found some time to investigate this.
>>> tscon should initialize nondefault to false in both pmix2x.c and 
>>> pmix_ext20.c
>>> 
>>> A better workaround is to update ompi_errhandler_callback, so it does not 
>>> invoke ompi_mpi_abort if status is OPAL_ERR_DEBUGGER_RELEASE
>>> 
>>> That still seems counter intuitive to me ...
>>> Does ERR stands for error ? I did not find any error here ...
>>> Should it be EVT for event instead ? Should ERR not be fired in the first 
>>> place ?
>>> Should Open MPI register a handler for this event (so nondefault is true 
>>> and ompi_errhandler_callback is not invoked here) ?
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Gilles
>>> 
>>> On Friday, July 15, 2016, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org <>> wrote:
>>> Okay, I’ll take a look - thanks!
>>> 
>>>> On Jul 15, 2016, at 7:08 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet 
>>>> <gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com <>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Yep,
>>>> 
>>>> The constructor of pmix2x_threadshift_t (tscon) does not initialize 
>>>> nondefault to false.
>>>> I won't be able to investigate this until Monday, but so far, my guess is 
>>>> that if the constructor is fixed, then RHEL6 will fail like RHEL7 ...
>>>> 
>>>> fwiw, the intercomm_create used to fail in Cisco mtt because of too many 
>>>> tasks and no over subscription, now it fails because of this bug.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> 
>>>> Gilles
>>>> 
>>>> On Friday, July 15, 2016, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org <>> wrote:
>>>> That would break debugger attach. Sounds to me like it’s just an 
>>>> uninitialized variable for in_event_hdlr?
>>>> 
>>>> > On Jul 15, 2016, at 1:20 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet <gil...@rist.or.jp <>> 
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Ralph,
>>>> >
>>>> > i noticed MPI_Comm_spawn is broken on master and on RHEL7
>>>> >
>>>> > for some reason i cannot yet explain, it works just fine on RHEL6 (!)
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > mpirun -np 1 ./dynamic/intercomm_create
>>>> >
>>>> > from the ibm test suite can be used to reproduce the issue.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > i digged a bit and i found OPAL_ERR_DEBUGGER_RELEASE is fired in mpirun, 
>>>> > then the tasks received
>>>> >
>>>> > a PMIX_ERR_DEBUGGER_RELEASE notification. it seems no event handler is 
>>>> > registered, so the default handler
>>>> >
>>>> > kills the task.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > for the time being, a trivial workaround is not to fire 
>>>> > OPAL_ERR_DEBUGGER_RELEASE in the first place
>>>> >
>>>> > (see patch below)
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > could you please have a look ?
>>>> >
>>>> > i am not sure whether client should not be notified at all, or whether 
>>>> > they should register a dummy handler.
>>>> >
>>>> > fwiw, in _event_hdlr, cd->nondefault is true on RHEL6, but false on 
>>>> > RHEL7, and that might indicate a race condition
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Cheers,
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Gilles
>>>> >
>>>> > diff --git a/orte/orted/orted_submit.c b/orte/orted/orted_submit.c
>>>> > index b9d571c..0de0e79 100644
>>>> > --- a/orte/orted/orted_submit.c
>>>> > +++ b/orte/orted/orted_submit.c
>>>> > @@ -2155,6 +2155,7 @@ static bool mpir_breakpoint_fired = false;
>>>> >
>>>> > static void _send_notification(void)
>>>> > {
>>>> > +#if 0
>>>> >     opal_buffer_t buf;
>>>> >     int status = OPAL_ERR_DEBUGGER_RELEASE;
>>>> >     orte_grpcomm_signature_t sig;
>>>> > @@ -2209,6 +2210,7 @@ static void _send_notification(void)
>>>> >     }
>>>> >     OBJ_DESTRUCT(&sig);
>>>> >     OBJ_DESTRUCT(&buf);
>>>> > +#endif
>>>> > }
>>>> >
>>>> > static void orte_debugger_dump(void)
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > devel mailing list
>>>> > de...@open-mpi.org <>
>>>> > Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel 
>>>> > <https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel>
>>>> > Link to this post: 
>>>> > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/07/19214.php 
>>>> > <http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/07/19214.php>
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> devel mailing list
>>>> de...@open-mpi.org <>
>>>> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel 
>>>> <https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel>
>>>> Link to this post: 
>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/07/19215.php 
>>>> <http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/07/19215.php>_______________________________________________
>>>> devel mailing list
>>>> de...@open-mpi.org <>
>>>> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel 
>>>> <https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel>
>>>> Link to this post: 
>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/07/19216.php 
>>>> <http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/07/19216.php>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> de...@open-mpi.org <>
>>> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel 
>>> <https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel>
>>> Link to this post: 
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/07/19220.php 
>>> <http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/07/19220.php>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','de...@open-mpi.org');>
>> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel 
>> <https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel>
>> Link to this post: 
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/07/19222.php 
>> <http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/07/19222.php>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post: 
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/07/19224.php

Reply via email to