Lucky!

Since each runs have a specific TMP, I still have it on disc.

for the faulty run, the TMP variable was:

TMP=/tmp/tmp.wOv5dkNaSI

and into $TMP I have:

openmpi-sessions-40031@lorien_0

and into this subdirectory I have a bunch of empty dirs:

cmpbib@lorien:/tmp/tmp.wOv5dkNaSI/openmpi-sessions-40031@lorien_0> ls -la |wc -l
1841

cmpbib@lorien:/tmp/tmp.wOv5dkNaSI/openmpi-sessions-40031@lorien_0> ls -la |more
total 68
drwx------ 1840 cmpbib bib 45056 Sep 13 03:49 .
drwx------    3 cmpbib bib   231 Sep 13 03:50 ..
drwx------    2 cmpbib bib     6 Sep 13 02:10 10015
drwx------    2 cmpbib bib     6 Sep 13 03:05 10049
drwx------    2 cmpbib bib     6 Sep 13 03:15 10052
drwx------    2 cmpbib bib     6 Sep 13 02:22 10059
drwx------    2 cmpbib bib     6 Sep 13 02:22 10110
drwx------    2 cmpbib bib     6 Sep 13 02:41 10114
...

If I do:

lsof |grep "openmpi-sessions-40031"
lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.gvfsd-fuse file system /run/user/1000/gvfs
      Output information may be incomplete.
lsof: WARNING: can't stat() tracefs file system /sys/kernel/debug/tracing
      Output information may be incomplete.

nothing...

What else may I check?

Eric


On 14/09/16 08:47 AM, Joshua Ladd wrote:
Hi, Eric

I **think** this might be related to the following:

https://github.com/pmix/master/pull/145

I'm wondering if you can look into the /tmp directory and see if you
have a bunch of stale usock files.

Best,

Josh


On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet <gil...@rist.or.jp
<mailto:gil...@rist.or.jp>> wrote:

    Eric,


    can you please provide more information on how your tests are launched ?

    do you

    mpirun -np 1 ./a.out

    or do you simply

    ./a.out


    do you use a batch manager ? if yes, which one ?

    do you run one test per job ? or multiple tests per job ?

    how are these tests launched ?


    do the test that crashes use MPI_Comm_spawn ?

    i am surprised by the process name [[9325,5754],0], which suggests
    there MPI_Comm_spawn was called 5753 times (!)


    can you also run

    hostname

    on the 'lorien' host ?

    if you configure'd Open MPI with --enable-debug, can you

    export OMPI_MCA_plm_base_verbose 5

    then run one test and post the logs ?


    from orte_plm_base_set_hnp_name(), "lorien" and pid 142766 should
    produce job family 5576 (but you get 9325)

    the discrepancy could be explained by the use of a batch manager
    and/or a full hostname i am unaware of.


    orte_plm_base_set_hnp_name() generate a 16 bits job family from the
    (32 bits hash of the) hostname and the mpirun (32 bits ?) pid.

    so strictly speaking, it is possible two jobs launched on the same
    node are assigned the same 16 bits job family.


    the easiest way to detect this could be to

    - edit orte/mca/plm/base/plm_base_jobid.c

    and replace

        OPAL_OUTPUT_VERBOSE((5, orte_plm_base_framework.framework_output,
                             "plm:base:set_hnp_name: final jobfam %lu",
                             (unsigned long)jobfam));

    with

        OPAL_OUTPUT_VERBOSE((4, orte_plm_base_framework.framework_output,
                             "plm:base:set_hnp_name: final jobfam %lu",
                             (unsigned long)jobfam));

    configure Open MPI with --enable-debug and rebuild

    and then

    export OMPI_MCA_plm_base_verbose=4

    and run your tests.


    when the problem occurs, you will be able to check which pids
    produced the faulty jobfam, and that could hint to a conflict.


    Cheers,


    Gilles



    On 9/14/2016 12:35 AM, Eric Chamberland wrote:

        Hi,

        It is the third time this happened into the last 10 days.

        While running nighlty tests (~2200), we have one or two tests
        that fails at the very beginning with this strange error:

        [lorien:142766] [[9325,5754],0] usock_peer_recv_connect_ack:
        received unexpected process identifier [[9325,0],0] from
        [[5590,0],0]

        But I can't reproduce the problem right now... ie: If I launch
        this test alone "by hand", it is successful... the same test was
        successful yesterday...

        Is there some kind of "race condition" that can happen on the
        creation of "tmp" files if many tests runs together on the same
        node? (we are oversubcribing even sequential runs...)

        Here are the build logs:

        
http://www.giref.ulaval.ca/~cmpgiref/dernier_ompi/2016.09.13.01h16m01s_config.log
        
<http://www.giref.ulaval.ca/~cmpgiref/dernier_ompi/2016.09.13.01h16m01s_config.log>

        
http://www.giref.ulaval.ca/~cmpgiref/dernier_ompi/2016.09.13.01h16m01s_ompi_info_all.txt
        
<http://www.giref.ulaval.ca/~cmpgiref/dernier_ompi/2016.09.13.01h16m01s_ompi_info_all.txt>


        Thanks,

        Eric
        _______________________________________________
        devel mailing list
        devel@lists.open-mpi.org <mailto:devel@lists.open-mpi.org>
        https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
        <https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>


    _______________________________________________
    devel mailing list
    devel@lists.open-mpi.org <mailto:devel@lists.open-mpi.org>
    https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
    <https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@lists.open-mpi.org
https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to