My proposal is not about adding new ways of deciding what is local and what
not. I proposed to use the corresponding MCA parameters to allow the user
to decide. More specifically, I want to be able to change the exclude and
include MCA to enable TCP over local addresses.

George

On Sep 21, 2016 4:32 PM, "Gilles Gouaillardet" <
gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> George,
>
> Is proc locality already set at that time ?
>
> If yes, then we could keep a hard coded test so 127.x.y.z address (and
> IPv6 equivalent) are never used (even if included or not excluded) for
> inter node communication
>
> Cheers,
>
> Gilles
>
> "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
> >On Sep 21, 2016, at 10:56 AM, George Bosilca <bosi...@icl.utk.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >> No, because 127.x.x.x is by default part of the exclude, so it will
> never get into the modex. The problem today, is that even if you manually
> remove it from the exclude and add it to the include, it will not work,
> because of the hardcoded checks. Once we remove those checks, things will
> work the way we expect, interfaces are removed because they don't match the
> provided addresses.
> >
> >Gotcha.
> >
> >> I would have agreed with you if the current code was doing a better
> decision of what is local and what not. But it is not, it simply remove all
> 127.x.x.x interfaces (opal/util/net.c:222). Thus, the only thing the
> current code does, is preventing a power-user from using the loopback
> (despite being explicitly enabled via the corresponding MCA parameters).
> >
> >Fair enough.
> >
> >Should we have a keyword that can be used in the
> btl_tcp_if_include/exclude (e.g., "local") that removes all local-only
> interfaces?  I.E., all 127.x.x.x/8 interfaces *and* all local-only
> interfaces (e.g., bridging interfaces to local VMs and the like)?
> >
> >We could then replace the default "127.0.0.0/8" value in
> btl_tcp_if_exclude with this token, and therefore actually exclude the
> VM-only interfaces (which have caused some users problems in the past).
> >
> >--
> >Jeff Squyres
> >jsquy...@cisco.com
> >For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/
> about/doing_business/legal/cri/
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >devel mailing list
> >devel@lists.open-mpi.org
> >https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.open-mpi.org
> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@lists.open-mpi.org
https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to