My understanding is there will be a vote, and the question will be
"Do we replace existing CLA with the new one ?"
If we vote to do so, then everyone will have to sign-off their commits,
regardless they previously had (or not) signed a CA

Cheers,

Gilles

On Wednesday, October 12, 2016, Pavel Shamis <pasharesea...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> a. As a developer I think it is a good idea to lower barriers for code
> contribution.
> b. IANAL, but this "signature/certification" is not identical to the
> existing CLA, which I think has special statement about patents. Seems like
> the new model is a bit more relaxed. Does it mean that OMPI amends existing
> CLA ? If not - what is the relation between the two. Most likely existing
> member would have to take the "new" CLA to the legal for a review.
>
> -Pasha
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:38 AM, George Bosilca <bosi...@icl.utk.edu
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bosi...@icl.utk.edu');>> wrote:
>
>> Yes, my understanding is that unsystematic contributors will not have to
>> sign the contributor agreement, but instead will have to provide a signed
>> patch.
>>
>>   George.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Pavel Shamis <pasharesea...@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','pasharesea...@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> Does it mean that contributors don't have to sign contributor agreement ?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Geoffrey Paulsen <gpaul...@us.ibm.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gpaul...@us.ibm.com');>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We have been discussing new Bylaws for the Open MPI Community.  The
>>>> primary motivator is to allow non-members to commit code.  Details in the
>>>> proposal (link below).
>>>>
>>>> Old Bylaws / Procedures:  https://github.com/open-mpi/om
>>>> pi/wiki/Admistrative-rules
>>>>
>>>> New Bylaws proposal: https://github.com/open-mpi/om
>>>> pi/wiki/Proposed-New-Bylaws
>>>>
>>>> Open MPI members will be voting on October 25th.  Please voice any
>>>> comments or concerns.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> devel mailing list
>>>> devel@lists.open-mpi.org
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','devel@lists.open-mpi.org');>
>>>> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> devel@lists.open-mpi.org
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','devel@lists.open-mpi.org');>
>>> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@lists.open-mpi.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','devel@lists.open-mpi.org');>
>> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@lists.open-mpi.org
https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to