Sigh - yet another corner case. Lovely. Will take a poke at it later this week. 
Thx for tracking it down

> On Jan 11, 2017, at 5:27 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet <gil...@rist.or.jp> wrote:
> 
> Ralph,
> 
> 
> 
> so it seems the root cause is a kind of incompatibility between the --host 
> and the --slot-list options
> 
> 
> 
> on a single node with two six cores sockets, 
> 
> this works :
> 
> mpirun -np 1 ./spawn_master 
> mpirun -np 1 --slot-list 0:0-5,1:0-5 ./spawn_master
> mpirun -np 1 --host motomachi --oversubscribe ./spawn_master 
> mpirun -np 1 --slot-list 0:0-5,1:0-5 --host motomachi:12 ./spawn_master 
> 
> 
> this does not work
>  
> mpirun -np 1 --host motomachi ./spawn_master # not enough slots available, 
> aborts with a user friendly error message
> mpirun -np 1 --slot-list 0:0-5,1:0-5 --host motomachi ./spawn_master # 
> various errors sm_segment_attach() fails, a task crashes
> and this ends up with the following error message
> 
> At least one pair of MPI processes are unable to reach each other for
> MPI communications.  This means that no Open MPI device has indicated
> that it can be used to communicate between these processes.  This is
> an error; Open MPI requires that all MPI processes be able to reach
> each other.  This error can sometimes be the result of forgetting to
> specify the "self" BTL.
> 
>   Process 1 ([[15519,2],0]) is on host: motomachi
>   Process 2 ([[15519,2],1]) is on host: unknown!
>   BTLs attempted: self tcp
> 
> mpirun -np 1 --slot-list 0:0-5,1:0-5 --host motomachi:1 ./spawn_master # same 
> error as above
> mpirun -np 1 --slot-list 0:0-5,1:0-5 --host motomachi:2 ./spawn_master # same 
> error as above
> 
> 
> for the record, the following command surprisingly works
> 
> mpirun -np 1 --slot-list 0:0-5,1:0-5 --host motomachi:3 --mca btl tcp,self 
> ./spawn_master
> 
> 
> 
> bottom line, my guess is that when the user specifies the --slot-list and the 
> --host options
> *and* there are no default slot numbers to hosts, we should default to using 
> the number
> of slots from the slot list.
> (e.g. in this case, defaults to --host motomachi:12 instead of (i guess) 
> --host motomachi:1)
> 
> 
> /* fwiw, i made
> 
> https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/2715 
> <https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/2715>
> https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/2715 
> <https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/2715>
> but these are not the root cause */
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> 
> Gilles
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject:      Re: [OMPI users] still segmentation fault with openmpi-2.0.2rc3 
> on Linux
> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:39:02 +0900
> From: Gilles Gouaillardet <gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com> 
> <mailto:gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com>
> Reply-To:     Open MPI Users <us...@lists.open-mpi.org> 
> <mailto:us...@lists.open-mpi.org>
> To:   Open MPI Users <us...@lists.open-mpi.org> 
> <mailto:us...@lists.open-mpi.org>
> 
> Siegmar,
> 
> Your slot list is correct.
> An invalid slot list for your node would be 0:1-7,1:0-7
> 
> /* and since the test requires only 5 tasks, that could even work with such 
> an invalid list.
> My vm is single socket with 4 cores, so a 0:0-4 slot list results in an 
> unfriendly pmix error */
> 
> Bottom line, your test is correct, and there is a bug in v2.0.x that I will 
> investigate from tomorrow 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gilles
> 
> On Wednesday, January 11, 2017, Siegmar Gross 
> <siegmar.gr...@informatik.hs-fulda.de 
> <mailto:siegmar.gr...@informatik.hs-fulda.de>> wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
> 
> thank you very much for your help. What does incorrect slot list
> mean? My machine has two 6-core processors so that I specified
> "--slot-list 0:0-5,1:0-5". Does incorrect mean that it isn't
> allowed to specify more slots than available, to specify fewer
> slots than available, or to specify more slots than needed for
> the processes?
> 
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> Siegmar
> 
> Am 11.01.2017 um 10:04 schrieb Gilles Gouaillardet:
> Siegmar,
> 
> I was able to reproduce the issue on my vm
> (No need for a real heterogeneous cluster here)
> 
> I will keep digging tomorrow.
> Note that if you specify an incorrect slot list, MPI_Comm_spawn fails with a 
> very unfriendly error message.
> Right now, the 4th spawn'ed task crashes, so this is a different issue
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gilles
> 
> r...@open-mpi.org <> wrote:
> I think there is some relevant discussion here: 
> https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/issues/1569 
> <https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/issues/1569>
> 
> It looks like Gilles had (at least at one point) a fix for master when 
> enable-heterogeneous, but I don’t know if that was committed.
> 
> On Jan 9, 2017, at 8:23 AM, Howard Pritchard <hpprit...@gmail.com <> 
> <mailto:hpprit...@gmail.com <>>> wrote:
> 
> HI Siegmar,
> 
> You have some config parameters I wasn't trying that may have some impact.
> I'll give a try with these parameters.
> 
> This should be enough info for now,
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Howard
> 
> 
> 2017-01-09 0:59 GMT-07:00 Siegmar Gross <siegmar.gr...@informatik.hs-fulda.de 
> <> <mailto:siegmar.gr...@informatik.hs-fulda.de <>>>:
> 
>     Hi Howard,
> 
>     I use the following commands to build and install the package.
>     ${SYSTEM_ENV} is "Linux" and ${MACHINE_ENV} is "x86_64" for my
>     Linux machine.
> 
>     mkdir openmpi-2.0.2rc3-${SYSTEM_ENV}.${MACHINE_ENV}.64_cc
>     cd openmpi-2.0.2rc3-${SYSTEM_ENV}.${MACHINE_ENV}.64_cc
> 
>     ../openmpi-2.0.2rc3/configure \
>       --prefix=/usr/local/openmpi-2.0.2_64_cc \
>       --libdir=/usr/local/openmpi-2.0.2_64_cc/lib64 \
>       --with-jdk-bindir=/usr/local/jdk1.8.0_66/bin \
>       --with-jdk-headers=/usr/local/jdk1.8.0_66/include \
>       JAVA_HOME=/usr/local/jdk1.8.0_66 \
>       LDFLAGS="-m64 -mt -Wl,-z -Wl,noexecstack" CC="cc" CXX="CC" FC="f95" \
>       CFLAGS="-m64 -mt" CXXFLAGS="-m64" FCFLAGS="-m64" \
>       CPP="cpp" CXXCPP="cpp" \
>       --enable-mpi-cxx \
>       --enable-mpi-cxx-bindings \
>       --enable-cxx-exceptions \
>       --enable-mpi-java \
>       --enable-heterogeneous \
>       --enable-mpi-thread-multiple \
>       --with-hwloc=internal \
>       --without-verbs \
>       --with-wrapper-cflags="-m64 -mt" \
>       --with-wrapper-cxxflags="-m64" \
>       --with-wrapper-fcflags="-m64" \
>       --with-wrapper-ldflags="-mt" \
>       --enable-debug \
>       |& tee log.configure.$SYSTEM_ENV.$MACHINE_ENV.64_cc
> 
>     make |& tee log.make.$SYSTEM_ENV.$MACHINE_ENV.64_cc
>     rm -r /usr/local/openmpi-2.0.2_64_cc.old
>     mv /usr/local/openmpi-2.0.2_64_cc /usr/local/openmpi-2.0.2_64_cc.old
>     make install |& tee log.make-install.$SYSTEM_ENV.$MACHINE_ENV.64_cc
>     make check |& tee log.make-check.$SYSTEM_ENV.$MACHINE_ENV.64_cc
> 
> 
>     I get a different error if I run the program with gdb.
> 
>     loki spawn 118 gdb /usr/local/openmpi-2.0.2_64_cc/bin/mpiexec
>     GNU gdb (GDB; SUSE Linux Enterprise 12) 7.11.1
>     Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>     License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later 
> <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> 
> <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>>>
>     This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
>     There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
>     and "show warranty" for details.
>     This GDB was configured as "x86_64-suse-linux".
>     Type "show configuration" for configuration details.
>     For bug reporting instructions, please see:
>     <http://bugs.opensuse.org/ <http://bugs.opensuse.org/>>.
>     Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at:
>     <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/ 
> <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/> 
> <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/ 
> <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>>>.
>     For help, type "help".
>     Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"...
>     Reading symbols from /usr/local/openmpi-2.0.2_64_cc/bin/mpiexec...done.
>     (gdb) r -np 1 --host loki --slot-list 0:0-5,1:0-5 spawn_master
>     Starting program: /usr/local/openmpi-2.0.2_64_cc/bin/mpiexec -np 1 --host 
> loki --slot-list 0:0-5,1:0-5 spawn_master
>     Missing separate debuginfos, use: zypper install 
> glibc-debuginfo-2.24-2.3.x86_64
>     [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
>     Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
>     [New Thread 0x7ffff3b97700 (LWP 13582)]
>     [New Thread 0x7ffff18a4700 (LWP 13583)]
>     [New Thread 0x7ffff10a3700 (LWP 13584)]
>     [New Thread 0x7fffebbba700 (LWP 13585)]
>     Detaching after fork from child process 13586.
> 
>     Parent process 0 running on loki
>       I create 4 slave processes
> 
>     Detaching after fork from child process 13589.
>     Detaching after fork from child process 13590.
>     Detaching after fork from child process 13591.
>     [loki:13586] OPAL ERROR: Timeout in file 
> ../../../../openmpi-2.0.2rc3/opal/mca/pmix/base/pmix_base_fns.c at line 193
>     [loki:13586] *** An error occurred in MPI_Comm_spawn
>     [loki:13586] *** reported by process [2873294849,0]
>     [loki:13586] *** on communicator MPI_COMM_WORLD
>     [loki:13586] *** MPI_ERR_UNKNOWN: unknown error
>     [loki:13586] *** MPI_ERRORS_ARE_FATAL (processes in this communicator 
> will now abort,
>     [loki:13586] ***    and potentially your MPI job)
>     [Thread 0x7fffebbba700 (LWP 13585) exited]
>     [Thread 0x7ffff10a3700 (LWP 13584) exited]
>     [Thread 0x7ffff18a4700 (LWP 13583) exited]
>     [Thread 0x7ffff3b97700 (LWP 13582) exited]
>     [Inferior 1 (process 13567) exited with code 016]
>     Missing separate debuginfos, use: zypper install 
> libpciaccess0-debuginfo-0.13.2-5.1.x86_64 
> libudev1-debuginfo-210-116.3.3.x86_64
>     (gdb) bt
>     No stack.
>     (gdb)
> 
>     Do you need anything else?
> 
> 
>     Kind regards
> 
>     Siegmar
> 
>     Am 08.01.2017 um 17:02 schrieb Howard Pritchard:
> 
>         HI Siegmar,
> 
>         Could you post the configury options you use when building the 
> 2.0.2rc3?
>         Maybe that will help in trying to reproduce the segfault you are 
> observing.
> 
>         Howard
> 
> 
>         2017-01-07 2:30 GMT-07:00 Siegmar Gross 
> <siegmar.gr...@informatik.hs-fulda.de <> 
> <mailto:siegmar.gr...@informatik.hs-fulda.de <>>
>         <mailto:siegmar.gr...@informatik.hs-fulda.de <> 
> <mailto:siegmar.gr...@informatik.hs-fulda.de <>>>>:
> 
>             Hi,
> 
>             I have installed openmpi-2.0.2rc3 on my "SUSE Linux Enterprise
>             Server 12 (x86_64)" with Sun C 5.14 and gcc-6.3.0. Unfortunately,
>             I still get the same error that I reported for rc2.
> 
>             I would be grateful, if somebody can fix the problem before
>             releasing the final version. Thank you very much for any help
>             in advance.
> 
> 
>             Kind regards
> 
>             Siegmar
>             _______________________________________________
>             users mailing list
>             us...@lists.open-mpi.org <> <mailto:us...@lists.open-mpi.org <>> 
> <mailto:us...@lists.open-mpi.org <> <mailto:us...@lists.open-mpi.org <>>>
>             https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> <https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users> 
> <https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> <https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users>>
>         <https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> <https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users> 
> <https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> <https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users>>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         _______________________________________________
>         users mailing list
>         us...@lists.open-mpi.org <> <mailto:us...@lists.open-mpi.org <>>
>         https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> <https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users> 
> <https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> <https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users>>
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     users mailing list
>     us...@lists.open-mpi.org <> <mailto:us...@lists.open-mpi.org <>>
>     https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> <https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users> 
> <https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> <https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@lists.open-mpi.org <> <mailto:us...@lists.open-mpi.org <>>
> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> <https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@lists.open-mpi.org <>
> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> <https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@lists.open-mpi.org <>
> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> <https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
> <Attached Message Part.txt>_______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.open-mpi.org <mailto:devel@lists.open-mpi.org>
> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel 
> <https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@lists.open-mpi.org
https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to