Ralph, in v1.10 series, BTL is still in the OMPI layer.
from v2, could the BTL directly use PMIx instead of rml (orte) ? Cheers, Gilles On Thursday, April 20, 2017, r...@open-mpi.org <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote: > Hi Shiqing! > > Been a long time - hope you are doing well. > > I see no way to bring the oob module back now that the BTLs are in the > OPAL layer - this is why it was removed as the oob is in ORTE, and thus not > accessible from OPAL. > Ralph > > On Apr 20, 2017, at 6:02 AM, Shiqing Fan <shiqing....@huawei.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','shiqing....@huawei.com');>> wrote: > > Dear all, > > I noticed that openib oob module has been removed since a long time ago, > because it wasn’t working anymore and nobody seemed need it. > But for some special operating system, where the rdmacm, udcm or ibcm > kernel support is missing, oob may still be necessary. > > I’m curious if it’s possible to bring this module back? How difficult > would it be to fix the bug in order to make it work again in 1.10 branch or > later? Thanks a lot. > > Best Regards, > Shiqing > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@lists.open-mpi.org > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','devel@lists.open-mpi.org');> > https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
