Okay.

I'll wait till we've had the discussion about removing embedded versions.

I appreciate the use of pkg-config, but it doesn't look like cudatookit 8.0
installed on our systems includes *.pc files.

Howard


2017-12-20 14:55 GMT-07:00 r...@open-mpi.org <r...@open-mpi.org>:

> FWIW: what we do in PMIx (where we also have some overlapping options) is
> to add in OMPI a new --enable-pmix-foo option and then have the configury
> in the corresponding OMPI component convert it to use inside of the
> embedded PMIx itself. It isn’t a big deal - just have to do a little code
> to save the OMPI settings where they overlap, reset those, and then check
> for the pmix-specific values to re-enable those that are specified.
>
> Frankly, I prefer that to modifying the non-embedded options - after all,
> we hope to remove the embedded versions in the near future anyway.
>
>
> On Dec 20, 2017, at 1:45 PM, Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr> wrote:
>
> Le 20/12/2017 à 22:01, Howard Pritchard a écrit :
>
> I can think of several ways to fix it.  Easiest would be to modify the
> opal/mca/hwloc/hwloc2a/configure.m4
> to not set --enable-cuda if --with-cuda is evaluated to something other
> than yes.
>
> Optionally, I could fix the hwloc configury to use a --with-cuda argument
> rather than an --enable-cuda configury argument.  Would
> such a configury argument change be traumatic for the hwloc community?
> I think it would be weird to have both an --enable-cuda and a --with-cuda
> configury argument for hwloc.
>
>
> Hello
>
> hwloc currently only has --enable-foo configure options, but very few
> --with-foo. We rely on pkg-config and variables for setting dependency
> paths.
>
> OMPI seems to use --enable for enabling features, and --with for enabling
> dependencies and setting dependency paths. If that's the official
> recommended way to choose between --enable and --with, maybe hwloc should
> just replace many --enable-foo with --with-foo ? But I tend to think we
> should support both to ease the transition?
>
> Brice
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.open-mpi.org
> https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.open-mpi.org
> https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@lists.open-mpi.org
https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to