On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 22:05 -0700, Thomas Pedersen wrote: > There was an an implicit assumption that any QoS data frame received > from a STA/TID with an active BA session was sent to this vif as part of > a BA. This is not true if IFF_PROMISC is enabled and the frame was > destined for a different peer, for example. Don't treat these frames as > part of a BA from the sending STA. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Pedersen <[email protected]> > --- > net/mac80211/rx.c | 4 ++++ > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/mac80211/rx.c b/net/mac80211/rx.c > index ee9e71b..ad39216 100644 > --- a/net/mac80211/rx.c > +++ b/net/mac80211/rx.c > @@ -776,6 +776,10 @@ static void ieee80211_rx_reorder_ampdu(struct > ieee80211_rx_data *rx) > (ack_policy == IEEE80211_QOS_CTL_ACK_POLICY_NORMAL))) > goto dont_reorder; > > + /* not actually part of this BA session */ > + if (compare_ether_addr(hdr->addr1, rx->sdata->vif.addr) != 0) > + goto dont_reorder;
Huh that seems strange. Shouldn't that rather check IEEE80211_RX_RA_MATCH? johannes _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://open80211s.com/mailman/listinfo/devel
