On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 21:42 -0700, Ashok Nagarajan wrote:
> + */
> +
> +u32 ieee80211_mandatory_rates(struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband,
Please remove the blank line and document the return value.
> +u32 ieee80211_mandatory_rates(struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband,
> + enum ieee80211_band band)
Passing both the band enum and the sband doesn't make a lot of sense.
> +{
> + struct ieee80211_rate *bitrates;
> + u32 mandatory_rates = 0;
> + enum ieee80211_rate_flags mandatory_flag;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!sband))
> + return 1;
> +
> + bitrates = sband->bitrates;
> + if (band == IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ)
> + mandatory_flag = IEEE80211_RATE_MANDATORY_A;
> + else {
> + mandatory_flag = IEEE80211_RATE_MANDATORY_B;
> + for (i = 0; i < sband->n_bitrates; i++)
> + if (bitrates[i].bitrate > 110) {
> + mandatory_flag =
> + IEEE80211_RATE_MANDATORY_G;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
You're not just moving the function but also changing the logic in it,
it'd be better to do in separate patches I think.
johannes
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
