On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 11:19 +0100, Marco Porsch wrote: > Move the beacon handler into mesh_neighbour_update where the STA > pointer is already available. This avoids additional overhead > and simplifies the handler. > The repositioning will also benefit mesh PS which uses the > T_offset value right after it has been updated. > > Rename the handler to better reflect its purpose. > > Signed-off-by: Marco Porsch <[email protected]> > --- > net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h | 10 +++++----- > net/mac80211/mesh.c | 8 ++------ > net/mac80211/mesh.h | 5 +++-- > net/mac80211/mesh_plink.c | 16 ++++++++++++--- > net/mac80211/mesh_sync.c | 47 > +++++++++++++++----------------------------- > 5 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h > index d77d3f7..e08b4c0 100644 > --- a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h > +++ b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h > @@ -560,11 +560,11 @@ struct ieee80211_if_ibss { > */ > struct ieee802_11_elems; > struct ieee80211_mesh_sync_ops { > - void (*rx_bcn_presp)(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata, > - u16 stype, > - struct ieee80211_mgmt *mgmt, > - struct ieee802_11_elems *elems, > - struct ieee80211_rx_status *rx_status); > + void (*rx_bcn)(struct sta_info *sta, > + struct ieee80211_mgmt *mgmt, > + struct ieee802_11_elems *elems, > + struct ieee80211_rx_status *rx_status, > + u64 tsf);
Is anyone actually planning to add more sync ops? I'm tempted to just remove the entire abstraction here, since there's only a single concrete implementation. johannes _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
