I'm on an older version kernel-o11s-0.5, which translates to 3.1.0-rc10-wl, can i replace the mac80211 and the ath drivers from the wireless-testing HEAD and expect wireless to work fine, or are there any pit falls.
On 26 February 2013 02:07, Thomas Pedersen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi S, > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:53 PM, శ్రీధర్ <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have the following setup three nodes configured to form a mesh > (secure), i > > enabled kememleak in the kernel, and after starting all the nodes and > > verifying that all of them established the mesh correctly. I left the > > system, no external data traffic introduced. After few hour i noticed a > > bunch of messages on the console "kmemleak: 6 new suspected memory leaks > > (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)", the number varied, attached is the out > > put of kmemleak file. > > > > Looks like the memory allocated in mesh_queue_preq() > > preq_node = kmalloc(sizeof(struct mesh_preq_queue), GFP_ATOMIC); > > if (!preq_node) { > > mhwmp_dbg("could not allocate PREQ node"); > > return; > > } > > Thanks for the analysis, guess we should run kmemleak once in a while > as well :). > > There does indeed seem to be a race in the code where two preqs may > get queued up, but only one of them will later get dequeued. A patch > for fixing this behavior would be welcome. > > On another note, wireless-testing HEAD doesn't seem to be triggering a > path refresh at all! Exactly which compat-wireless are you running? > > -- > Thomas > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
