On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 10:08 -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 03:37:42PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > Ok this is big ... Let me tackle it patch by patch I guess :-)
> >
> > > +struct mesh_local_bss {
> >
> > > + bool can_share;
> >
> > Does that even make sense? I mean, wouldn't you simply not link/create
> > such an entry if the given vif can't share?
>
> We could do that, but as written mpath table now wants an mbss pointer
> in either case. Seemed more straight-forward to just always require
> it even though the structures are kind of pointless for unshared vifs.
But why even add it to the global list if you only need it locally?
Anyway I guess it doesn't matter, just seemed a bit odd.
johannes
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
