> The subject doesn't really match what this does. I would also describe > the new kernel behavior in the commit log in addition to the motivation. > > Maybe something like this:
Thank you for your comment. I will change the subject and the commit log. > From a cursory glance I think this needs to be GFP_ATOMIC -- don't you get > lockdep warnings? (If not, make sure CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled, and > that you aren't hitting other lockdep warnings prior to this code running.) > This code is in an RCU read critical section as far as I can tell. Yes, this should be GFP_ATOMIC. I will change. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
