I think this is a good idea. Besides ppl should first read the README file or CHANGE LOG before installing.
The 0.81 version will make it easier to install it under samba4.0-alpha7, and people who are really interesting in this project will realized by themselves that this still under heavy deportment. Sassy On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Julien Kerihuel <[email protected]>wrote: > On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 16:38 +0100, Julien Kerihuel wrote: > > Hi List, > > > > The Samba team is in the process of releasing samba4-alpha7 for > > integration into FC11. > > > > I've tested the related git-tree and while there are minor issues > > currently being fixed, it works fine with OpenChange > > (libmapi/mapitest/mapiproxy/openchange server). > > > > It just requires minor changes to OpenChange; renaming some used > > structure parameters for most of it. > > > > I currently think it may be a good idea to push a 0.8.1 maintainer > > release relying on samba4-alpha7 tarball and including the > > libmapi/utils/warnings/memory leak fixes we have introduced since > > libmapi-0.8 ROMULUS. > > > > My only concern is about openchange server stability. It is under heavy > > development, changing quickly and not meant to be robust/fault tolerant > > code. I'm worry people may get a wrong idea if we ship this code/package > > it. > > One of the thing I would also like to fix with this release is > PACKAGE_VERSION for all other libraries but libmapi. > > Would it be worthwhile to introduce better version management? Anyone > has suggestions on the best way to achieve this? > > --- > Julien Kerihuel > [email protected] > OpenChange Project Manager > > GPG Fingerprint: 0B55 783D A781 6329 108A B609 7EF6 FE11 A35F 1F79 > > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.openchange.org/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.openchange.org/listinfo/devel
