On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 14:44 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 14:34 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote: > > As Brad mentioned, Samba4 is GPLv3 or later - so even > > if OpenChange contributors/developers were willing to > > move OpenChange to LGPLv3. > > Thanks, that is pretty clear now. > > > I'd rather turn the discussion the other way and ask > > you what would be the drawback in developing a true open source solution? > > I can assure you that I do not need any statement in support of open source > philosophy and development process. Must unfortunately I'm not in the > position of making strategic choice for the company I work for, and the > management has chosen the other way. So this is a no-go.
Paolo, I didn't mean to *educate* you here, that was truly not my intention. Furthermore, I guess that if you have been asking for a license question it is because it matters to you. I'm sorry your company chose a closed-source business model, but as you stated that is not into your hands. I anyway wish to see you around OpenChange. Cheers, Julien. --- Julien Kerihuel [email protected] OpenChange Project Manager GPG Fingerprint: 0B55 783D A781 6329 108A B609 7EF6 FE11 A35F 1F79
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.openchange.org/listinfo/devel
