hello again, On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Julien Kerihuel <[email protected]> wrote: > I only have one comment/thought regarding the private_data pointer > assignation within the Subscribe call. [...]
> I think adding a small assessor such as get_notification_private_data > could be useful in this latter case. In the meantime, no show-stopper > for me, just want to keep it in mind upon really needed. Ok, it seams very reasonable to me. Must I resend the patches, adding a: get_notification_private_data(mapi_session_t* session, int subscribe_id); public function ?!? BTW do someone have some comments regarding this patch: http://mailman.openchange.org/pipermail/devel/2009-April/001228.html ? Should I open a related track issue? I'm sorry if I'm a bit too pressing, I only want to avoid that the patch is lost. Cheers, Paolo _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.openchange.org/listinfo/devel
