On 11/06/15 07:04, Murray McCulligh wrote: > I’ve run into an issue that I need some advice on how to tackle. > > Outlook does not open a new pipe and BIND request for AsyncEMSMDB, > rather it takes the existing pipe used for EMSMDB and issues an > ALTER_CONTEXT request. Currently in mapiproxy a new pipe is then > opened to exchange and a BIND request for AyncEMSMDB endpoint is > issued. Is this the correct way to proxy AsyncEMSMDB or should > mapiproxy be trying to alter its existing pipe to Exchange? I’ve > tried both approaches and neither worked during my initial attempts > but before digging in further I wanted to see which approach is the > correct one to take.
This is an interesting question, more insights of what is not working would help to narrow down the issue you're facing. Hence, what exactly is not working? What is the behavior you observe? Br, Julien. -- Julien Kerihuel j.kerih...@openchange.org OpenChange Project Founder Twitter: http://twitter.com/jkerihuel GPG Fingerprint: 0B55 783D A781 6329 108A B609 7EF6 FE11 A35F 1F79
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@lists.openchange.org http://mailman.openchange.org/listinfo/devel
