On 07/18/2015 02:51 PM, Joshua Lindsey wrote:
Output for ldd libdcerpc.so is:
<snip>
Nothing obvious in the ldd output. Are you certain that this is an
identical error? It may not matter much though as I think you'd be
better using packages with some reasonable guarantee of support (see below).
I may go with packaged versions if I need to, I just don't want
headaches down the line if there are buxfixes I'll be missing. Any
idea if I'd need to do a clean install to ensure things go right if I
go with packaged?
If you haven't done anything else with the box, what does a clean
install take, 20 minutes? Distribution supplied packages will certainly
lag behind development, but they should be expected to be reasonably
stable and well tested with the distribution. When building from source,
building, patching, testing, troubleshooting, etc., that is all your
responsibility. Additionally, when upgrades come around, you can expect
that they have already been tested in a working environment, and as an
aside, you are not messing with paths in /usr/local.
Inverse has a (presumably) good repo to use for latest and greatest:
http://www.sogo.nu/nc/support/faq/article/how-to-install-sogo-on-ubuntu.html
Also, there are quite a few Ubuntu users on the sogo-users list that can
be of assistance as well. I'm not certain what the current state is. I
know they were having similar issues with OCSManager as I was having in
Arch around the turn of the year, but the lack of recent reports would
suggest that it has been fixed (which I have yet to do in Arch -- but
it's on the nearly immediate todo list now that Arch is up to date on
Samba).
HTH
--DJ
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@lists.openchange.org
http://mailman.openchange.org/listinfo/devel
