Hi > Oh, right. Ignore the SHORTNAME stuff, but the directory names in GAR > should be the full package name. I also find "ajccollect" to be a > horrible name for "commons-collections". It is too long to be > "commons-collections"? > unfortunatly, yes it is :( > I like how Debian name their packages, commons collections is named > "libcommons-collections-java" [1], saying that it is a "library" for > "java". They do similar stuff for perl and other languages. Given the > existing prefix "pm" for Perl modules, I'd suggest to use > "java_commons_collections". The java packages should be under a "java/" > category directory and the build name should be "commons-collections" IMO. > Sounds good to me. Any objections ?
Cheers -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site français des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
