On Tuesday 23 September 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Greetings. Let me know if I'm writing to the wrong list. > > About the ALSA state files, is it mandatory that they carry all 94 > controls? Why can't they just change the controls that are effectively > related to their file names?
I think alsactl needs all the settings because it's just designed to save and restore specific mixer states. > If they only changed the controls that are pertinent to a specific > function, then we could use multiple files at the same time, and would > minimize interference between different states... It's not a bad idea, but it needs something different to alsactl as the purpose is different. It might be a good thing to suggest on the FSO list though, assuming they don't already have something like this in the roadmap. I think it needs a daemon to mediate requests by different apps for the mixer settings they require. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
