On Wednesday 24 September 2008, Holger Freyther wrote: > On Wednesday 24 September 2008 11:12:15 Andy Green wrote: > > Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > | It's up the the person in charge of testing the linux-openmoko bitbake > > | recipe to determine what the latest stable version in the feeds should > > | be by updating that sane-srcrevs.inc file (after booting an image using > > | that kernel of course). > > > > That may be, but despite that I need a daily package for kernel I can > > point people to. Actually blocking current stable kernel from users by > > not packaging it, which seems to be the case, is completely backwards. > > point them to unstable, it will build the latest stable version every > day[1]. > > z. > > > [1] At least this is the plan
Things don't seem to be going according to plan then. Kernel packages currently at http://downloads.openmoko.org/repository/unstable/om-gta02/ are dated September 15th which Andy says are several revisions behind the current stable version. http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/devel/2008-September/002248.html _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
