On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Michael Trimarchi<trimar...@gandalf.sssup.it> wrote: > Hi, > > Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: >> >> Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: >>> >>> Am Dienstag, den 07.07.2009, 19:04 +0200 schrieb Lars-Peter Clausen: >>> >>>> >>>> We also did a lot of cleanup and stability fixes to openmoko specific >>>> device drivers, I certainly want to submit my changes but I'm not sure if >>>> they will get accepted as some are basically complete rewrites and also get >>>> rid of conceptually broken sysfs entries. >>>> >>> >>> -v please :) >>> >> >> For example the jbt6k74 driver had one internal state variable containing >> both resolution and power mode. So if you wanted to suspend the driver you >> had to remember which resolution it has. And on resume switch back to that >> resolution. This state was exported through sysfs. But losing the resolution >> when changing power mode, is in my opinion a bad design. So I got rid of it >> and with it the sys entry. >> >> Also there are some drivers which have mostly been rewritten and producing >> a clean patch set for them will probably require quite some work and time >> which I currently don't have. > > I think that we can start from a clean linux repository align with the arm > linux branch, Apply > to it the Nelson patchset that are in submission on the arm mailing list, > and start with > your patchset for having a new tree.
The patchset is already in mainline. Last time I checked I couldn't make it boot but I haven't checked in the last few days. (There is another thread in the OM kernel mailing list about this). http://n2.nabble.com/Status-of-upstream-inclusion-td3072123.html _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@lists.openmoko.org https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
