Hi, I was too fast, both patches have indeed been applied in 1.3 (I messed up with diff :-) ). However, I still don't get the revision scheme. I use svn in-house, and the behavior here seems to be different. Any clues ?
Regards, Jerome On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 14:46 +0100, Jerome Martin wrote: > Bogdan, All, > > It seems that two pending patches from me have been commited to SVN > (received an email from tracker), but I can't find the relevant > modifications in a fresh export of 1.3 tree. Something has changed > (i.e. line 80 from dlg_hash.h has an added comment suggsting that > start_ts now uses absolute unix ts), but I can't find the > implementation of the features themselves ... > > Also, I'm a bit puzzled about the revision numbering scheme : I notice > that the exported revision number has not changed since my last > export, but there are new changes with lower rev numbers. How comes ? > (I exported with svn export > https://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/openser/branches/1.3 > openser, and I get rev 3662, but this 3662 is DIFFERENT from the last > 3662 I checked out a few days ago ...). There is something I don't > get, I thought that opposed to CVS, svn had only global rev numbering > for a repository ... > > Anyone can help me understand what's happening ? > Have the patches 1886974 and 1867707 really been applied ? > > Regards, > > Jérôme Martin | LongPhone > Responsable Architecture Réseau > 122, rue la Boetie | 75008 Paris > Tel : +33 (0)1 56 26 28 44 > Fax : +33 (0)1 56 26 28 45 > Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Web : www.longphone.com > > > Jérôme Martin | LongPhone Responsable Architecture Réseau 122, rue la Boetie | 75008 Paris Tel : +33 (0)1 56 26 28 44 Fax : +33 (0)1 56 26 28 45 Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web : www.longphone.com
<<attachment: smiley-3.png>>
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
